A firestorm of conflicting opinions usually accompanies any discussion of masturbation. One reason for that is that there is no specific biblical teaching on it. It is in the Bible, although not in the verses usually used to refer to it. The main reasons that people say masturbation is sin or evil stem from the experiences of sex addicts who started with masturbation and the sinful thinking that can accompany it, and from two records from the Bible. The first record is in Genesis 38 and is about the sons of Judah, who was the son of Jacob and the great-grandson of Abraham.
Genesis The Church of England does not have a position on whether masturbation is a sin or not. Those who are Christ's have crucified the flesh with its passions and desires. Blessed are those whose way is blameless, Masturbation and leviticus walk in the law of the Lord! Kimball taught that the law of chastity includes "masturbation Pray for God on your side, with whom you may live oeviticus to the honor of His Name. For I am the Lord who brought you up out of the land of Egypt to be your God. Keenanargues that as monastic Masturbation and leviticus developed, the sexual lives of monks came under scrutiny from two theologians, John Cassian — and Caesarius of Arles —who commented on the "vices" of the 'solitary' life.
Vintage tool cleaning. Navigation menu
Anthony Kosnik editor " ". However, the teacher should not leave the adolescent with the Massachusetts snow and ice contractors ass that there is Masturbation and leviticus nothing wrong with masturbation. For example, the Bible does not defend the use of marijuana, but different principles such as obeying the law, treating your body as a temple, not to be intoxicated, and to let Masgurbation dominate us, everything this has a bearing on the issue and can therefore lead you to a "biblical" conclusion that marijuana use is a sin. When Paul speaks about impurity and sexual greed as idolatry in Ephesians and Colossianshe accurately describes how it works. Evl - Espoon seurakunnat". It's really like everything: It's not a sin to drink alcohol, but it can lead to sin if you drink yourself drunk. McMahon also states, "The need for a Biblical anf of lust and masturbation is necessary. Masturbation does produce an emission of semen, so it would be covered by these laws. Main topics. Even in the early s, some evangelical sexual advice books for teens still contained warnings about masturbation, but by the end of the decade, those warnings had disappeared, because evangelicals who noticed that the Bible said nothing directly about masturbation believed that they had made a mistake to proscribe it. Hooper, addressed the issue in an Masturbation and leviticus paper. Canon 8 of the Synod of the Grove of Victory from the 6th century imposes penances for "he who [has relations] between the thighs, [three] years.
All graphics and images are copyright of A True Church.
- Among the world's religions, views on masturbation vary widely.
- This topic promises to get me into trouble :- Nevertheless, here it is.
- No temptation has overtaken you but such as is common to man; and God is faithful, who will not allow you to be tempted beyond what you are able, but with the temptation will provide the way of escape also, so that you will be able to endure it.
- Recommended books.
- This question has been widely debated because the Scriptures do not directly refer to the practice.
Among the world's religions, views on masturbation vary widely. Some religions view it as a spiritually detrimental practice, some see it as not spiritually detrimental and others take a situational view. Among these latter religions, some view masturbation as allowable if used as a means towards sexual self-control , or as part of healthy self-exploration, but disallow it if it is done with wrong motives or as an addiction. Masturbation was now valued as an adult, non-pathological, pleasurable activity.
Due to this cultural change across the spectrum, even theological reassessments of masturbation as a positive sexual practice were possible — though, admittedly, rare. A Psychology Today article stated that the more religious people are, the more likely they are to restrict their sexual fantasies, have fewer sex partners, use less pornography and express stronger disapproval of the use of sex toys. The biblical story of Onan Gen. According to James Nelson, there are three interpretive examinations why Onan's act is condemned: the Onan story reflects firm "procreative" accent of the Hebrew interpretation regarding sexuality, a constant of the "prescientific mind" to consider that the child is contained in the sperm the same way a plant is contained in its seed, and masturbation as well homosexual acts by men have been condemned more strongly than same acts by women in the Judeo-Christian tradition.
Ilona N. Rashkow states: "it is questionable whether masturbation is considered a category of 'negative' sexual activity in the Hebrew Bible" and that Lev "refer to the emission rather than its circumstances.
Johnson's biblical view on masturbation: "treating a solitary sexual experience, whether wet dream or masturbation, as a purely ceremonial cleanliness issue and not as a matter of morality. Verses 16 and 17 say that a man who has an emission of semen should wash and be ceremonially unclean until evening.
Verse 18 goes on to say that if a man and woman have intercourse, the same cleanliness rules apply. By bringing up intercourse separately, the passage surely does imply that the emission of semen in verses 16 and 17 occurred for the man individually.
The passage may be referring to a nocturnal emission, or wet dream, rather than masturbation, but the passage is not specific. Johnson suggests that this Leviticus passage is significant for treating a solitary sexual experience, whether wet dream or masturbation, as a purely ceremonial cleanliness issue and not as a matter of morality. The passage also puts no more disapproval on the solitary experience than it does on intercourse. Since Christians today commonly view the Old Testament ceremonial law as no longer valid, this author suggests that masturbation is not in itself a moral concern from a biblical perspective and is no longer a ceremonial concern either.
Wray explains what the Bible actually states and does not state about masturbation: "Returning to the Levitical list of sexual taboos, curiously missing from the list is any mention of masturbation. Carl L. Jech stated "Masturbation is never mentioned in the Bible". Malan and Vern Bullough have stated "nowhere in the Bible is there a clear unchallenged reference to masturbation" and "masturbation is not mentioned in the Bible or Book of Mormon".
According to The Oxford Handbook of Theology, Sexuality, and Gender , some scholars suggest that the word 'hand' in Matthew , Mark , and Matthew may implies masturbation as in the Mishnah m.
Because of its divine institution for the propagation of man, the seed is not to be vainly ejaculated, nor is it to be damaged, nor is it to be wasted. Scholars such as Raj Bhala and Kathryn M. Kueny say that Clement's statement includes both coitus interruptus and masturbation, the acts which make "injury to nature". Younger considers that Clement speaks about masturbation as well "masculine women and effeminate men" in his Paedagogus , make mention of violating the nature "to have sex for any other purpose than to produce children".
However, the dissident Catholic moral theologian Charles E. Curran claimed that "the fathers of the Church are practically silent on the simple question of masturbation". Mielke stated James A. Brundage 's view as: "the themes of masturbation and sexual fantasy were unimportant to either pagan or Christian writers until the fourth or fifth centuries" when the rise of monasticism happened. Catholic academic Giovanni Cappelli undertook a study "concerning the problem of masturbation during the first millennium.
Among his conclusions are: 1 Nowhere in the Old Testament or in the New is there an explicit confrontation with the issue of masturbation. Brundage offers a differing view on the fourth point. He believes that neither pagan nor early Christian writers had paid much attention to these matters because they "apparently considered them trivial" . Thomas Laqueur agrees.
He notes that, "The ancient world cared little about the subject; it was a backwater of Jewish and Christian teaching about sexuality. In fact, solitary sex as a serious moral issue can be dated with a precision rare in cultural history; Laqueur identifies it with the publication of the anonymous tract Onania in about Masturbation is a creation of the Enlightenment, of some of its most important figures, and of the most profound changes it unleashed.
It is modern. It worried at first not conservatives, but progressives. It was the first truly democratic sexuality that could be of ethical interest for women as much as for men, for boys and girls as much as for their elders.
This is because Laqueur claims that masturbation "could only be named as such when the 'self' emerged as an autonomous being. Giovanni Cappelli, as quoted by James F. Keenan , argues that as monastic communities developed, the sexual lives of monks came under scrutiny from two theologians, John Cassian — and Caesarius of Arles — , who commented on the "vices" of the 'solitary' life.
Cappelli claims that "their concerns were not with the act of masturbation, but with the monks who vowed chastity. The monks' promise made masturbation an illicit act; the act itself was not considered sinful.
Brundage states in his book that Cassian regards "masturbation and nocturnal pollution central issues in sexual morality and devoted a great deal of attention to both matters". Cassian considers "nocturnal emission" a very important problem as it is an indication of "carnal lust " and, if a monk still has not overcome it, "his religious life and his salvation might well be in peril".
In his Sermons , Caesarius considers "any sexual longing, to say nothing of deliberate self-stimulation, a serious sin and placed it on an even footing with adultery or excessive indulgence in sex by married persons".
It is known that, prior to the sixth century, the Church's teachings on masturbation and many other moral issues were incoherent. Catholic researchers such as Bernard Hoose and Mark Jordan have found that claims to a continuous teaching by the Church on matters of sexuality, life and death and crime and punishment are "simply not true". Not only was there "inconsistency, contradiction and even incoherence" in the Church's doctrines but the researchers' work has led to the insight that the tradition itself is "not the truth guarantor of any particular teaching.
The Eastern Orthodox Church or Orthodox Christian Church views sexuality as a gift from God that finds its fulfillment in the marital relationship, and therefore the misuse of the gift of human sexuality is sinful.
Because the act of masturbation is self-directed, and by its nature is incapable of expressing love and concern for another person, it is viewed as a distortion of the use of the gift of sexuality. This is especially apparent when masturbation becomes an addiction. In the least, the practice of self-pleasure is viewed as not honoring the purpose of God's gift of sexuality. The sexual sins of fornication , adultery and masturbation, as well as hatred, jealousy, drunkenness and other sins are considered to be sins of the heart as much as the body.
It is thought that turning away from sexual sin is turning away from self-indulgence for the purpose of self gratification. Instead of turning to the desires of the flesh, the Orthodox Christian turns to the Holy Spirit , whose fruit is believed to be love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness and self-control. They exercise genital acts, yet prevent the conceiving of children.
Not in order to produce offspring, but to satisfy lust, are they eager for corruption. John T. Noonan Jr. Epiphanius calls these practices, which include coitus interruptus, masturbation, and homosexual acts, as "the rites and ceremonies of the devil". The Coptic Orthodox Church views masturbation as a sin because it is regarded as a "form of sexual pleasure outside of God's design".
By masturbation is to be understood the deliberate stimulation of the genital organs in order to derive sexual pleasure. Although "it is said that psychology and sociology show that [masturbation] is a normal phenomenon of sexual development, especially among the young," this does not change the fact that it "is an intrinsically and seriously disordered act" and "that, whatever the motive for acting this way, the deliberate use of the sexual faculty outside normal conjugal relations essentially contradicts the finality of the faculty.
For it lacks the sexual relationship called for by the moral order, namely the relationship which realizes 'the full sense of mutual self-giving and human procreation in the context of true love. This is because the deliberate use of the sexual faculty outside of marriage is, according to the teaching of the Church, contrary to its primary purpose of procreation and unification of the husband and wife within the sacrament of marriage. Wiesner-Hanks and Carly Daniel-Hughes, say that Augustine condemns all sexual activities that contrary to procreation including homosexual acts and masturbation—or "solitary pleasure".
According to Simon Lienyueh Wei, as cited by some scholars, John Cassian and Augustine of Hippo hold that it is a sin if the emission is the outcome of "a lustful encounter or pleasurable recollection"; otherwise, it is seen as "a physical function". Mark W. Elliott says that Pope Gregory I c. He does, however, specify that nocturnal emissions—if caused by natural superfluity or sickness—are unproblematic for holiness, but where there is consent i.
Canon 8 of the Synod of the Grove of Victory from the 6th century imposes penances for "he who [has relations] between the thighs, [three] years.
However, if by one's own hand or the hand of another, two years. David  and Canons of John the Faster. From the sixth to the eleventh century, there are more references in the penitentials to masturbation, but it is considered with much more indulgence than the other sins of flesh. In the penitential written by Archbishop Theodore of Tarsus seventh century , for example, "the penance is from seven days for the cleric who poured out his seed without touching himself, up to fifty days for the one who voluntarily masturbates spread in a church.
Fifty days may seem a lot, but it's tiny when you know that at the same time, a young man touching a virgin woman gets a full year. After the turn of the first millennium, more theologians began to condemn masturbation in an increasingly strident manner. If left unchecked, it can "ascend by grades" to "fondling each other's male parts" mutual masturbation , which can lead one to "fornicate between the thighs" femoral intercourse "or even in the rear" anal intercourse.
Pope Leo IX himself condemned masturbation more clearly, from which time it was traditionally perceived as a mortal sin, classified as a sexual deviance. Is it not proof that it is far too common for every priest to have the possibility of absolving it immediately without referring to his superior? In the late medieval period, Jean Gerson wrote a confessional manual called On the Confession of Masturbation. Taylor goes on to note that "Medieval theologians recognized that by inquiring in They deduced, however that it was worth teaching a few young penitents how to masturbate in order to save the greater number who were already masturbating without confessing to it.
Particularly remarkable are the instructions that the priest feign a certain casualness, and that he address the confessant with a disarming affection, calling him "friend" and pretending that masturbation is neither sinful nor shameful in order to make the penitent admit to it, insinuating that he can relate to the penitent's acts—"Friend, I well believe it"—only to then backtrack and condemn the act as sinful and shameful after all.
The laity did not undertake regular confession at this time but, "For those such as the ordained and the scrupulous who did undergo frequent and rigorous confessional examination, the obligation to confess in circumstances such as Gerson describes for even the most routine and private of sins such as masturbation came to cause anxiety Early medieval penance was only for grave sins, but now the most mundane of sins could be given excruciating attention.
The Roman Catholic Church accused Albigensians of masturbation as part of their propaganda campaign against them. Brundage notes that medieval "penitentials occasionally mentioned female autoeroticism and lesbianism.
They treated female masturbation in much the same way as the male act, although they were more censorious of female sexual play that involved dildos and other mechanical aids than they were of male use of mechanical devices in masturbation. Pierre Humbert states, "During the Middle Ages, masturbation - so-called "softness" - was considered an unnatural sin, but for the vast majority of theologians, priests and confessors, the offense was much less serious than fornication, adultery or sodomy; and they generally preferred not to talk too much about it so as not to suggest its existence to those who did not know about it.
Walter and Timothy E. O'Connell said that "as long ago as , Curran used the idea [of fundamental option ] as a way to make sense of the fact that the Catholic tradition has long held that masturbation is an objectively serious misuse of human sexuality even though statistical evidence suggests that the overwhelming majority of human persons — including many whose behavior otherwise suggests a generous and loving approach to life — engage in this behavior.
What shall we make of this paradox? Curran suggests that for various reasons the assertion that masturbation involves "objectively grave matter" is not convincing.
It was the first truly democratic sexuality that could be of ethical interest for women as much as for men, for boys and girls as much as for their elders. We are aware of only one argument that attempts to draw directly from the Scripture to establish a basis for the acceptance of masturbation, found in J. Under ancient common law, if a man died before producing any heirs, his wife was given to the next nearest relative as a wife. But it shall be when evening approaches, he shall bathe himself with water, and at sundown he may reenter the camp " Deuteronomy For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh and the lust of the eyes and the boastful pride of life, is not from the Father, but is from the world.
Masturbation and leviticus. Navigation menu
Some sources in the early Church interpreted the phrase as referring to people of soft morals ; i. That may well be the correct meaning, because presumably people from that era would probably have still known the meaning of the word "arsenokoitai. Still others thought that it meant " masturbators. But by the 20th century, masturbation had become a more generally accepted behavior, whereas many Christians were concentrating on homosexuality as a despised activity.
New Biblical translations abandoned references to masturbators and switched the attack to homosexuals. The last religious writing in English that interpreted 1 Corinthians as referring to masturbation is believed to be the [Roman] Catholic Encyclopedia of Each Bible translating team seems to take whatever activity that their group particularly disapproves of and inserts it into this verse. To compound their error, they usually do not have the decency to indicate by a footnote that the actual meaning of the word is unknown, and that they are merely guessing its meaning.
Conservative Christians tend to be very concerned about their own salvation and that of their family and friends. It is a pity that one of the behaviors that many Christians feel will cause them to lose their salvation is currently unknown. Many probably fear that they might inadvertently engage in the activity and thus having to spend eternity in Hell. Such items as blood, skin blemishes, semen, and menstrual discharge are considered to have negative magical properties by the Hebrew Scriptures a.
Old Testament. Touching a dead body was also considered to be very polluting. Many injunctions concerning these items were among the commands which comprise the Mosaic Code. A man automatically became ritually unclean any time that he had an ejaculation of semen. Even after washing his body, he and his clothing remained unclean for a period of time.
Some acts that caused ritual uncleanliness even required a temple ritual to reverse. The following three verses are three injunctions from the Mosaic Code. The language of the King James Version sounds rather quaint today, almost four centuries after it was originally translated. These three injunctions are generally ignored by Christians today.
There are 32 verses in the Christian Scriptures that contain the word " pornea " in the original Greek. It is normally translated in the King James Version of the Bible as " fornication. This word akatharsia, a noun, and akathartos, an adjective, appears in Romans , 2 Corinthians , and Galatians It is often translated " uncleanness " in some Bible versions.
In the Hebrew Scriptures Old Testament a person or a couple might become ritually unclean:. Jesus and his disciples regularly violated the Hebrew Scriptures' laws regarding ritual uncleanness. For example, they did not wash their hands before eating -- a shocking behavior to their fellow Jews.
Jesus " enunciated the great principle that there is no ceremonial, but only moral and spiritual, uncleanness. Again, some conservative Christian churches and ministries have expanded the term to include masturbation. More details about akatharsia. The following information sources were used to prepare and update the above essay. The hyperlinks are not necessarily still active today.
About this site About us Our beliefs Is this your first visit? True religion? Seasonal events Science vs. Overview of Bible passages about masturbation: In the past, Christian leaders have mainly used two Bible passages to condemn masturbation: One passage, in the Hebrew Scriptures Old Testament , describes the death of Onan. It was a widespread belief that Onan was killed by God because he masturbated. This event was the source of the term " Onanism " -- once used as a synonym for masturbation.
But further analysis indicates that he was murdered for the "crime" of using a primitive method of birth control to avoid conceiving a child. The Christian churches have now generally accepted the latter interpretation of this passage. The term Onanism is now rarely used. The second passage is from the Christian Scriptures. It refers to a unknown form of behavior. The meaning of the original Greek phrase has been lost.
Bible interpreters have assigned various meanings to the term in the past two millennia. Originally it was believed to indicate a lack of a strong moral sense. Later it was believed to refer to masturbation. Among many conservative Protestants today, it refers to homosexuality. To our knowledge, no Christian group today interprets the passage as referring to masturbation. Genesis -- The sin of Onan: This passage describes how Tamar's first husband Er was killed by God because he was wicked.
I Corinthians -- Sins that Paul believes will send you to Hell: The author, Paul, listed a group of sinful activities. Leviticus Go and wash: Such items as blood, skin blemishes, semen, and menstrual discharge are considered to have negative magical properties by the Hebrew Scriptures a.
Verses 16 and 17 refer to a man's ejaculation but does not contain a reference to a sexual partner. This is interpreted by some as referring to ejaculation resulting from masturbation while the man is alone. The verses read: " And if any man's seed of copulation go out from him, then he shall wash all his flesh in water, and be unclean until the even.
And every garment, and every skin, whereon is the seed of copulation, shall be washed with water, and be unclean until the even[ing]. It declares that both parties are ritually unclean because of the man's ejaculation of semen. They are both required to bathe. They remain ritual unclean for the rest of the day: The verse reads: " The woman also with whom man shall lie with seed of copulation, they shall both bathe themselves in water, and be unclean until the even[ing].
About us. Our beliefs. Is this your first visit? Contact us. External links. Visitors' essays. Our forum. However, the Temple Scroll , used by the sect responsible for the Dead Sea Scrolls , states that a man may not enter the holy grounds of the Future Temple in the New Jerusalem for a period of seven days after ejaculating. Maimonides stated that the Tanakh does not prohibit masturbation. In the Mishnah, masturbation is treated under a broader view about frequent examination of the male and female organs.
It teaches that while for women it is praiseworthy to frequently examine themselves, for men their hands "ought to be cut off". The Talmud likens the act to murder and idolatry. Leviticus discusses a ritual defilement relating to emission of sperm. The traditional rabbinical interpretation of Leviticus 15 was that it applies to all sperm flows, including sperm flows due to masturbation. But [in P] the ejaculation of semen results in only a one-day impurity that requires laundering and ablutions , regardless of whether the act takes place during legitimate intercourse or by the self, deliberately masturbation or accidentally nocturnal emission.
Milgrom acknowledges that the rabbis condemned masturbation Nevertheless, "it is their enactment, not that of Scripture. Rabbinic authorities have in certain instances permitted intentional extra-vaginal ejaculation in tandem with one's wife.
The tannaim Rabbi Eliezer and Rabbi Meir Tosefta , Niddah 2: , for safety reasons prior to the advent of female birth control permits exterior ejaculation for a duration of 24 months post childbirth Talmud Yebamoth Tosefot cites the opinion of Rabbi Yitzchak Isaac ben Samuel who permitted an occasional exterior ejaculation with one's wife on the condition that one does not accustom himself to always doing so Tosfoth, Yebamoth 34b, Tosfoth Sanhedrin 58b.
Rabbenu Asher, followed by Rabbi Elijah Spira , commented that an occasional exterior ejaculation in tandem with one's wife is not considered "extracting semen in vain" and not banned by the Talmud as long as the intention is not to avoid impregnating one's wife and it is done on rare occasion - as this is not likened to the desire of Onan , who wished to avoid impregnating Tamar entirely.
A more explicit permissive stance is that of the tosafist rabbi Isaiah di Trani the Elder:. What was the forbidden action of Er and Onan that the torah prohibits? But if his intent.. Rabbi Isaiah the Elder's view is likewise echoed by his descendant, rabbi Isaiah di Trani the Younger.
Rabbi Eleazar of Worms , in his commentary to the verse "Adam and his wife, and were not embarrassed" Genesis permits any activity with one's wife necessary to "quiet lit. Some poskim decisors of Jewish law rule that it is possible to masturbate to avoid arayot forbidden relationships. There is disagreement among the poskim whether masturbation is an acceptable way of procuring semen for artificial insemination or in vitro fertilisation.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. Learn how and when to remove these template messages.
This article uncritically uses texts from within a religion or faith system without referring to secondary sources that critically analyze them. Please help improve this article by adding references to reliable secondary sources , with multiple points of view. September Learn how and when to remove this template message. The neutrality of this article is disputed.
Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page. Please do not remove this message until conditions to do so are met. October Learn how and when to remove this template message. Gagnon , "A critique of Jacob Milgrom's views on Leviticus and ".
Judaism portal Sexuality portal. CCAR Journal. Central Conference of American Rabbis. Retrieved American Reform Responsa. June Journal of Religion and Health. Springer Netherlands. Nevertheless, there is no legislation in the Bible pertaining to masturbation.
Hoover Journal of Psychology and Theology. Biola University. Retrieved 12 November
Do the laws of uncleanness mean masturbation is sinful?
This topic promises to get me into trouble :- Nevertheless, here it is. It is customary for those who write books for teens and youth to caution them against masturbation. Beyond this, many will even find a way to say it is a sin.
So, what does the Bible say on masturbation? There is virtually nothing said in the Bible about masturbation. Abuse of the Bible on the Subject This is practically the only text used against masturbation. Genesis Genesis , "And Onan knew that the seed should not be his; and it came to pass, when he went in unto his brother's wife, that he spilled it on the ground, lest that he should give seed to his brother.
And the thing which he did displeased the LORD: wherefore he slew him also. In this passage, Onan rebelled against the direct command of his father in Genesis , "And Judah said unto Onan, Go in unto thy brother's wife, and marry her, and raise up seed to thy brother.
Indeed, this was evil in the eyes of the Lord, "therefore He killed him" Genesis The whole context is in regard to a man trying to engineer which of his wives will give birth to the first son and thus the heir Deuteronomy Onan displeased God in that God did not want his people manipulating His sovereignty.
The point is not wasting the "seed," the point is about cruel control of destiny, degrading of the wife, and disobeying a direct command of God. Here is what Adam Clarke's Commentary says on this passage: Verse 9: "Onan knew that the seed should not be his.
Verse "Wherefore he slew him also. We find from this history that long be fore the Mosaic law it was an established custom, probably founded on a Divine precept, that if a man died childless his brother was to take his wife, and the children produced by this second marriage were considered as the children of the first husband, and in consequence inherited his possessions.
Leviticus Another passage that some use against masturbation is: Leviticus , "And if any man's seed of copulation go out from him, then he shall wash all his flesh in water, and be unclean until the even. And every garment, and every skin, whereon is the seed of copulation, shall be washed with water, and be unclean until the even. The woman also with whom man shall lie with seed of copulation, they shall both bathe themselves in water, and be unclean until the even.
However, as you can see, this passage is not in reference to a man copulating by himself , but with "the woman also. The practical effect of this legislation was that when a man had religious duties to perform, whether this involved worship or participation in God's holy wars, sexual intercourse was not permitted Exodus , Leviticus , Deuteronomy , 1 Samuel , 2 Samuel But, let us assume for a moment that verses refer to masturbation.
Does this passage say it is a sin? No, it does not. Most of the other unclean acts mentioned in the previous chapters stated one must sacrifice an animal to atone for that uncleanness. However, look at the context of Leviticus No sacrifice was required! No sin offering is required. The man and woman had simply to wash themselves in water and wait until evening.
That's all! Remember, anything that is considered a "sin" in the Old Testament requires a blood sacrifice. No exceptions. If a sin is involved, there must be the shedding of blood, period! The fact that Leviticus does not require even an animal sacrifice is proof that the act mentioned in this passage is not a "sin.
For example, it is not a sin if a priest touches an unclean thing, but he would be considered unclean, and he must bathe himself in water and remain unclean until the evening Leviticus Menstruous women do not commit a sin every month when they have their cycle, but they are considered unclean.
Anyone who touches her will be unclean until evening. Anything she lies on or sits on is unclean. Whoever touches her bed, or anything she sits on, must wash their clothes and bathe in water and will be unclean until evening Leviticus But it is not a sin to do so. Therefore, there are two ways in which this "emission of semen" could happen. The ejaculation could be the result of a nocturnal emission, that is, a wet dream.
Or, it could be the result of masturbation. Either way, the man is "unclean" until evening. This unclean is nowhere described as sinfully unclean. Throughout the law, people are called unclean, but they have done nothing evil e. Leviticus , 43; ; Numbers , , 14, 16, Masturbation is Homosexuality? Another objection people make is that masturbation is homosexuality.
And use verses such as: Leviticus , "Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination. Leviticus , "If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.
All sexual sins must involve at least two. Masturbation is Fornication? Some teach that masturbation is self-abuse and sexually immoral, citing 1 Corinthians The problem with their use of this passage is that masturbation is never described in the Bible as sexually immoral, or as fornication. The context of 1 Corinthians is sex with a harlot 1 Corinthians , which is certainly sexually immoral. But, masturbation is never identified in this way. Their self-abuse argument comes from "modern dictionaries," because masturbation is given as a synonym for self-abuse in modern dictionaries.
But this begs the question at hand. Is it truly abusive, in and of itself? Is masturbation an intended use of the sex organ, or is it abuse? Obviously, some people think so, and so they identify the term synonymously with self-abuse.
Reason Reason is the tool of the apologist from here on out. He will reason that sex is only for making babies during the marriage state. He will not talk about sex being pleasurable.
Note Solomon on the pleasures of laying with one's wife: Proverbs , "Drink waters out of thine own cistern, and running waters out of thine own well.
Let thy fountains be dispersed abroad, and rivers of waters in the streets. Let them be only thine own, and not strangers' with thee. Let thy fountain be blessed: and rejoice with the wife of thy youth. Let her be as the loving hind and pleasant roe ; let her breasts satisfy thee at all times; and be thou ravished always with her love. And why wilt thou, my son, be ravished with a strange woman, and embrace the bosom of a stranger?
The fountain is a discreet reference to the man's pleasure in copulation. The graphical language is very obvious. The sin would only be in sharing the fountain with anyone other than the god-given wife.
In the right setting, the fountain is to be very busy for a godly man and women who are married Song of Solomon ; Song of Solomon ,13, " Let him kiss me with the kisses of his mouth: for thy love is better than wine. A bundle of myrrh is my wellbeloved unto me; he shall lie all night betwixt my breasts.
Also, note that procreation is not mentioned once in the Song of Solomon. The satisfaction of laying with one's husband or wife is everywhere in the book, and it is of God and good. So, masturbation cannot be pushed into the sin category by saying that copulation is only for having babies.
Now, some claim that if a married couple has sex for purposes other than to bear children, then they would be defiled. Even though one of the reasons for having sex with your wife is to have children, it is not the only reason.
Hebrews does not say the bed is undefiled only in situations where the couple is making children in bed. The next trick the alleged experts will use is that masturbation is selfish. Well then, so is eating a chocolate bar. If I eat a chocolate bar and enjoy it, I am selfish. It gratifies my need for pleasure in food, and that too is sanctioned by David, Solomon, and others as they describe special feast type foods which satisfy them. So, that one won't fly either.
The next trick is to say that there are many things the Bible does not mention, but we know that they are sin by other contexts. Things like smoking and drug abuse will be cited. Well, masturbation was not some late thing to come along which Bible writers did not know about. Adam could have conceivably masturbated if he had wanted to. Masturbation is lawful. There is nothing in the word of God that condemns it. The Lord never even intimates that it is some form of abuse or not according to His purpose.
There is nothing new under the sun Ecclesiastes , and it is not as if this is a new thing of which the Lord was unaware! Leviticus addresses the issue, at least the result of it, and no condemnation is given. Therefore, neither should we condemn what God does not Matthew God gave council on much to do with sexual things, and He made it very clear which things were sinful or forbidden: 1.